Several questions are being mixed
A debate about dupatta or hijab can involve religious obligations, cultural dress, legal rules, parental influence, public harassment and self-expression. These questions are related, but they are not interchangeable. A person may be committed to modesty and still criticize humiliating or violent enforcement.
What the text says
Quran 24:30–31 speaks to modest conduct by men and women. Different scholars debate specific interpretations and their application to contemporary garments. A source-led article should explain the verse and credible scholarship rather than assuming every Pakistani custom is required by revelation.
Responding to provocative language
A placard mocking expectations about dress may offend believers. It is possible to state why that language is hurtful without denying a woman’s right to safety. Equally, an activist should distinguish criticism of coercion from ridicule of women who choose religious clothing.
A sounder public dialogue
Discuss obligations with knowledge and gentleness. Reject harassment, threats and forced exposure or forced covering. The measure of social reform should include whether women can move, learn, seek help and disagree without fear.
Sources and further reading
Editorial note: This article offers information and analysis, not a personal legal ruling or an official statement of the organizers.